🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.