🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.